Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Dan-Bunkering (America) Inc. v. M/T Sveva
as 1:2015cv21024
Plaintiff:
Dan-Bunkering (America) Inc.
Defendant:
M/T Sveva
Thirdparty_defendant:
SGR Energy LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
M/T Sveva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv20877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Galyon et al
as 3:2014cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Richard Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
M. T. Galyon, F. R. Holtsman, M. C. Pelletier and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bodmann et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2014cv01884
Plaintiff:
James Bodmann and Lucille Bodmann
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, M & T Bank Corporation and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2014cv80478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv61320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ace American Insurance Company et al v. M/T Torm Aalborg et al
as 6:2013cv00818
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company and Seaport Canaveral Corp.
Defendant:
M/T Torm Aalborg, M/T Eships Liwa, Heroic Regulus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bresko v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 8:2013cv01243
Plaintiff:
Karen Ann Bresko
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
