Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Manta Industries Ltd. v. Law et al
as 1:2016cv08308
Plaintiff:
Manta Industries Ltd.
Defendant:
Paul P. Law , Yogesh M. Anand , Rich Kids Jean Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPECIALTY SURGERY OF MIDDLETOWN v. AETNA et al
as 2:2012cv04508
Plaintiff:
SPECIALTY SURGERY OF MIDDLETOWN
Defendant:
AETNA , JOHN/JANE DOES, 1-10, ABC LLC, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SPECIALTY SURGERY OF MIDDLETOWN v. AETNA et al
as 2:2012cv04509
Plaintiff:
SPECIALTY SURGERY OF MIDDLETOWN
Defendant:
AETNA , JOHN/JANE DOES, 1-10, ABC LLC, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
AO ASSOCIATES LLC v. AETNA et al
as 2:2012cv04281
Plaintiff:
AO ASSOCIATES LLC
Defendant:
AETNA , JOHN/JANE DOES, 1-10, ABC CORP., 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ADVANCED SURGERY CENTER v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv02715
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED SURGERY CENTER
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF NEW JERSEY, INC. , JOHN/JANE DOES, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frederick Flores v. ADT Security Services Inc, et al
as 11-16114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK B. FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES INCORPORATED and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-10; XYZ Corporations 1-10; and ABC LLC 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
POLITI v. PEOPLES MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2010cv04194
Plaintiff:
ANDREW POLITI
Defendant:
PEOPLES MORTGAGE CORPORATION, CREDIT SUISSE FINANCIAL, ROBERT SAYPOL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
