Cases 21 - 30 of 45
PODURGIEL v. ACME MARKETS INC.
as 3:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PODURGIEL
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MORRISSEY v. ACME MARKETS, INC et al
as 1:2016cv01658
Plaintiff:
DEBRA MORRISSEY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC , JOHN DOE, INC. and JOHN ROE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DISOMMA v. ACME MARKETS, INC et al
as 1:2016cv01595
Plaintiff:
NOELLE DISOMMA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC , SUPERVALU, INC. , SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPINO et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
CAROL J. SPINO and BARRY SPINO
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and JOHN DOE COMPANY 1-10
Cross_claimant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOE COMPANY 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
LEVEY et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2015cv08000
Plaintiff:
LISA LEVEY and GORDON LEVEY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROESSEL v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv07369
Plaintiff:
CINDY ROESSEL
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , ABC CORP 1-10 and XYZ MAINTENANCE COMPANY 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DISOMMA v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv07205
Plaintiff:
NOELLE DISOMMA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , SUPERVALU, INC. , SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOTTA v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 3:2015cv05322
Plaintiff:
TRACY MOTTA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUGAN et al v. ACME MARKETS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05267
Plaintiff:
LAURA C. DUGAN and JIM DUGAN
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS INC. , MICHAEL NEISSER , JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MERCADO-YAEGER et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05258
Plaintiff:
ROSALIND MERCADO-YAEGER and ROBERT YAEGER
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
