Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Lee v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50455
Petitioner:
Mario Anton Lee
Respondent:
Mr. Andrew Ciolli and Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lee v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50393
Plaintiff:
Mario Anton Lee
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli, Mr. Graham and Ms. Smiddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim et al v. Board of Governors et al
as 1:2021cv05997
Plaintiff:
Yehin Kim and The State Commission LLP
Defendant:
Board of Governors, Louis Dejoy, Anton G. Haggar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Stinson v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv03347
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Stinson
Defendant:
States Attorney, Circuit Court Judge and Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Saul
as 1:2021cv02138
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Karl Anton Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv01193
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Jon D Loughran, NFL DIY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Lee v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50143
Petitioner:
Mario Anton Lee
Respondent:
Warden USP Thomson and Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bludgeon Riffola Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv01051
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Cynthia Nicholson, Thank KTM and others
Plaintiff:
Bludgeon Riffola Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bernard v. Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv05355
Defendant:
Katherine Barrett, Fiorella Russell, Anton Chan and others
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
