Cases 21 - 30 of 77
AISPURO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31541
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ABEL M. AISPURO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AISPURO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83346
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ABEL AISPURO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eutimio Aispuro v. Dr. Dedilo et al
as 2:2019cv06938
Plaintiff:
Eutimio Aispuro
Defendant:
Dr. Dedilo and Santa Barbara County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02060
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERTA, DAVID ADAMS, BERNARD ADENIRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aispuro et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2018cv02045
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Aispuro Nunez and Lazaro Aispuro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Adams et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2018cv05007
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Berta, Theo J. Gomez, David Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brionez v. Robley et al
as 1:2018cv02062
Defendant:
Sweat, Robley, Aispuro and others
Plaintiff:
Gavino J. Brionez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADENIRAN et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01406
Plaintiff:
BERNARD ADENIRAN , EVERARDA AISPURO , ALMA ALFORD and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , MCKESSON CORPORATION , OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Sun et al
as 2:2018mj01290
Defendant:
Jesus Cesar Aispuro (2) and Ji Hoon Sun (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
