Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Spencer v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Spencer
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., AMR, Inc. and Secretary of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Pope v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
Marsha Pope
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hutchins v. AMR Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00514
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hutchins
Defendant:
AMR Corporation and American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hahn v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
Michael Hahn
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00377
Plaintiff:
Grizz Lee
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., CIGNA Corp., Transport Workers Union of America and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
McCully v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00310
Plaintiff:
Megan McCully
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: O
United States of America et al v. Albert Investment Co Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00637
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Albert Investment Co Inc, American Airlines Inc, APAC Arkansas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Wilson-Valento v. American Home Assurance Co et al
as 5:2008cv00537
Plaintiff:
Donna Wilson-Valento
Defendant:
American Home Assurance Co, American Airlines Inc, Specialty Risk Services and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
