Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
BEBERMAN v. BLINKEN
as 1:2022cv03434
Petitioner:
JULIE BEBERMAN and JULIE A. BEBERMAN
Respondent:
ANTHONY BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 4140 Foreign Service Grievance Act
ISOM v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv03392
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
ANTHONY BLINKEN, JAPAN HEALTH POLICY NOW and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ISOM v. MCGOUGH et al
as 1:2022cv03388
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
ADAM MCGOUGH, ANTHONY BLINKEN, GENARO GARCIA LUNA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
AL BIHANI v. BIDEN et al.
as 1:2022cv02845
Petitioner:
TOFIQ NASSER AWAD AL BIHANI
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, ANTHONY BLINKEN and others
Not Classified By Court:
LANCE A. OKAMURA and STEVEN D. YAMASHITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
