Cases 21 - 30 of 565
Lobo Soares, et al. v. Garland
as 24-357
Petitioner:
DENILSON LOBO SOARES, KESSIANE REIS DE ARAUJO and JANE DAVYLLA LOBO ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defaz et al v. Westar Construction Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Marco Defaz and Ney Araujo
Defendant:
Westar Construction Group, Inc., Nicholas Grgas, Thomas Nicholas Grgas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Monange Araujo v. Manuelito Furniture Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Eric Guiliano Monange Araujo
Defendant:
Manuelito Furniture Inc doing business as Big Boss Furniture and Mahmoud Saleh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Araujo Da Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4388
Petitioner:
GUILHERME ARAUJO DA SILVA, GIZELE FRANCO-VALADARES SILVA, LUIZA FRANCO-SILVA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nunes Araujo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4239
Petitioner:
DIEGO APARECIDO NUNES ARAUJO, JULIA GRACIELIA GOMES CAJADO and VALLENTINA CAJADO NUNES ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Araujo v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13125
Plaintiff:
Deivison Araujo
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Araujo v. The Famous Group, LLC
as 3:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Michael Araujo
Defendant:
The Famous Group, LLC d/b/a Famous Automotive & Tire Center
Pereira de Oliveira, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4123
Petitioner:
NARA CINTIA PEREIRA DE OLIVEIRA and JOAO VITOR PEREIRA DE ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv24744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
