Cases 21 - 30 of 423
Armstrong v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Linda Armstrong
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ballard v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Deldrick Simmons
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denby v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munn v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lester Munn
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Reno P. Roberts
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
William Garrison
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braggs v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lynn Braggs and Lynn Bragg
Defendant:
Bruce Armstrong, Spencer Lucas, Daniel Parler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Darryl Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, John Doe, Jerry Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
