Cases 21 - 30 of 747
Ramaraju ErramrajuIn re: Ramaraju Erramraju
as 23-13340
Petitioner:
In re: RAMARAJU ROM ERRAMRAJU
Respondent:
DAVID LAMAR and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Standfield v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Timothy Bryan Standfield
Respondent:
Asst Warden Joesph Headley and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emanger GilbertIn re: Emanger Gilbert
as 23-13150
Petitioner:
In re: EMANGER L. GILBERT
Respondent:
WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and CHARLES S. COODY
Matthew PhillipsIn re: Matthew Phillips
as 23-13080
Petitioner:
In re: MATTHEW SHERMAN PHILLIPS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Oscar AvilezIn re: Oscar Avilez
as 23-12997
Petitioner:
In re: OSCAR AVILEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Christopher SurlesIn re: Christopher Surles
as 23-12806
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER SURLES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Kristopher Phillips v. Warden, Limestone CF, et al
as 23-12665
Petitioner / Appellant:
KRISTOPHER DALE PHILLIPS
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBORAH TONEY, LIMESTONE CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
State of Alabama, et al v. Administrator, US Environmental Protection Agency, et al
as 23-12528
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
In re: Elmer Dennis
as 23-12515
Petitioner:
In re: ELMER DENNIS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Santana v. State of Alabama et al
as 6:2023cv00954
Petitioner:
David Santana
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Administrator White and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
