Cases 21 - 30 of 276
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Williams v. Social Security Commissioner
as 4:2023cv02814
Plaintiff:
PAULETTA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Alamdar Hamdani and Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Lance Harris v. USA, et al
as 23-3618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE JERMAINE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, doing business as Jody L. King and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, doing business as Merrick B. Garland
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
