Cases 21 - 30 of 30
WATSON v GODFREY, et al
as 3:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
J GODFREY, MARTIN, T JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Godfrey et al
as 3:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Tyson N. Watson
Defendant:
J. Godfrey, Officer Martin, T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glaspy v. Maddox et al
as 3:2011cv01249
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Glaspy
Defendant:
Colonel Maddox, B. E. Anderson, Sgt. Espito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaton v. Cowart et al
as 2:2011cv00525
Plaintiff:
Wayne M. Beaton
Defendant:
B. E. Cowart and R. L. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huls v. B&E Electrical, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00341
Plaintiff:
Clark A. Huls
Defendant:
B&E Electrical, Inc., B&E Electrical of SC, Inc. and William R. Veno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. DeCrane Aircraft Seating Company, Inc.
as 6:2008cv01906
Plaintiff:
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
Defendant:
DeCrane Aircraft Seating Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hodges v. B & E Houck Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv14289
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Hodges
Defendant:
B & E Houck Enterprises, Inc., Volo Holdings Ft. Pierce, LLC, Nashville Jet Center, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Castro v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP-I et al
as 5:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Louis Castro
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP-I, B. E. Ford, Cathy Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Weaver et al v. Geiger et al
as 3:2007cv01205
Plaintiff:
Chester Weaver, Sr. and Chester Weaver, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Geiger, W. J. O'Leary, C. Wate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holtzman v. B/E Aerospace, Inc. et al
as 9:2007cv80551
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Holtzman and Jeffrey Holtzman
Defendant:
B/E Aerospace, Inc. and Thomas P McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
