Cases 21 - 30 of 48
KING v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK S. KING
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT, MAXIM CASAS and HUDSON COUNTY NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISALDEN-DIAZ et al v. CASAS et al
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
ERIC A. VISALDEN-DIAZ, BRIONNE CUFF, TERRY STOCKS and others
Defendant:
MAXIM CASAS and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANDBERRY v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
CHANCY GRANDBERRY
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, NAJAD, CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON et al v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON and MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, LT NAJAD, CASRRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUFF v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2024cv00840
Petitioner:
BRIONNE CUFF
Respondent:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT, CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and METRO STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FERMAN v. SCOTT ETIAL et al
as 2:2023cv22559
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT ETIAL, BROWN and DILLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOY v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2023cv21272
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCCOY
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, TPR. J. D. ANGELO, TPR. M. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2023cv22469
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP JAYSON GONZALEZ
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, OFFICER GUZMAN, OFFICER BUENO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2023cv20777
Plaintiff:
DARIUS LECEAN JOSEPH THOMAS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, BECKY SCOTT, MICHAEL DANTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERMAN v. FLORES et al
as 2:2023cv16017
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
DAVID FLORES, DOCTOR, BECKY SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
