Cases filed in New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 379
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff: Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SL-X Trading Europe Limited, et al v. Bank Of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2019cv04885
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC, EquiLend Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff: SL-x Trading USA LLC, SL-x Technology UK Ltd., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Axiom Investment Advisors, LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02973
Defendant: Portigon AG, Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Axiom Investment Advisors, LLC, Axiom HFT LLC, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv04233
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 5514 Debt Collection Act of 1982
Iosilevich v. MSC Cruises (USA) et al
as 1:2022cv01897
Plaintiff: FELIKS IOSILEVICH BY POA ILYA FELIKSOVICH IOSILEVICH and Feliks Iosilevich
Defendant: MSC CRUISES (USA), MSC CRUISES S.A., RICHARD SASSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant: Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022mc00053
Plaintiff: City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Petitioner: Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?