Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Portley-El v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv01309
Petitioner:
Patrick Duray Portley-El
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill, Correction Corporation of America and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Portley-El v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv01310
Petitioner:
Patrick Duray Portley-El
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill, CCA and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv01202
Plaintiff:
Leo Simmons
Defendant:
H. Brill, Phillips, J. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adelhardt v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv01120
Petitioner:
Robert Adelhardt, Sr.
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purdy v. Brill
as 1:2009cv00944
Petitioner:
Rickey Purdy
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosman v. Russell et al
as 1:2009cv00809
Plaintiff:
David Mosman
Defendant:
(I) Russell, Russell, (I) Sternivan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Souders v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv00778
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Souders
Defendant:
Brill, Maine, Smalizer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv00741
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Allen
Defendant:
Brill and Northrup
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris v. Colorado, State of et al
as 1:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Neal Allen Morris
Defendant:
Colorado, State of, Executive Branch of the Government of Colorado, The, Governor of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nunn v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv00068
Petitioner:
Rayfeal R. Nunn
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
