Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Birks v. Runnels et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01336
Plaintiff: Lawrence Birks
Defendant: Dave L. Runnels and C. A. Terhune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Kolacki v. William Duncan, et al
as 09-15027
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD KOLACKI
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM DUNCAN and C. A. TERHUNE
Mark Faurot, II v. C. Terhune, et al
as 08-17743
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK CONRAD FAUROT, II
Defendant - Appellee: C. A. TERHUNE, G. RODRIGUEZ and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Sheets v. Terhune et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01056
Plaintiff: Daniel Dean Sheets
Defendant: C. A. Terhune, Jose Ramon Garcia, Edward M. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steven Zinnamon v. C. Terhune
as 08-72703
Petitioner: STEVEN R. ZINNAMON
Respondent: C. A. TERHUNE
James Rivera v. C. Terhune
as 08-16303
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES EARL RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee: C. A. TERHUNE, Director of the CDC
Christopher Simmons v. C. Lee, et al
as 08-16177
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER ISAAC SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee: C. LEE, M.D., FRAGOSO, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Lawrence Birks v. C. Terhune, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-15841
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAWRENCE BIRKS
Defendant - Appellee: C. A. TERHUNE, California Department of Corrections, DAVE L. RUNNELS, HDSP Warden, DAVE MCGUIRE, HDSP Correctional Peace Officer and others
Edmonds v. Terhune
as 2:2008cv00281
Petitioner: Eugene Edmonds
Respondent: C A Terhune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurd v. Terhune, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-55162
Petitioner - Appellant: DALE R. HURD
Respondent - Appellee: C. A. TERHUNE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?