Cases 21 - 29 of 29
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
Claimant:
RAYMOND KIRICH and PATRICIA KIRICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NEWILL v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2012cv01344
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES NEWILL
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BONITA PROPERTIES, LLC v. C&C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
BONITA PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
C&C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY , CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY , DONALD CHECKAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUMPHREY v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv00647
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN PUMPHREY
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
STROPE v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
CHAD A. STROPE
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. and C & C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOODALL v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69358
Plaintiff:
MARTIN RANDALL WOODALL, JR.
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. and M/V LEILA SHEARER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAYCRAFT v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
NICK CRAYCRAFT
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
STOVER v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01389
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SCOTT STOVER
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. and C & C MARINE MAINTENANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
DAVIN v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
as 2:2008cv00601
Plaintiff:
WAYLON E. DAVIN
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 General Admiralty and Maritime Law
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
