Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Mausser et al v. Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
as 2:2011cv00678
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mausser and Marilyn Mausser
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kellar v. Ewing & Ewing Attorneys PC et al
as 2:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
Richard Kellar
Defendant:
Ewing & Ewing Attorneys PC and Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fleming v. Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
as 2:2010cv01816
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Fleming
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Farmer v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
as 2:2009cv00431
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Farmer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv08142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Topp v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00867
Plaintiff:
Peter Douglas Topp
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Cavalry SPV I, LLC, Ewing & Ewing Attorneys, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chaddock v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00720
Plaintiff:
Mhylee M Chaddock
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Cavalry SPV I LLC, Ewing & Ewing Attorneys, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morey v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Morey
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, Cavalry SPV I LLC, Nelson Ewing, II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
