Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Carreras v. Lane et al
as 5:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Kathy Lane and Michael Carvajal
Plaintiff:
Roxana Carreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARRERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97366
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE CARRERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruz v. Carreras
as 4:2020cv10101
Defendant:
Deputy Carreras
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez Cruz v. Brady Carrers
as 4:2020cv10093
Defendant:
Deputy Joshua Brady Carreras, Monroe County Sheriff's Office and Sergeant Katz
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76778
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO C CARRERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69520
Plaintiff:
JULIAN CARRERA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRERAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33963
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUBEN CARRERAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRERAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12736
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUBEN CARRERAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18455
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE CARRERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Produce Pay, Inc. v. Mama Pacha, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv60375
Defendant:
Jose Israel Carrera, Lorena Muro, Agro Exportaciones Wayra S.A.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Produce Pay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
