Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Champion Window Manufacturing and Supply Co., LLC v. Champion Restoration, LLC
as 1:2012cv00926
Plaintiff:
Champion Window Manufacturing and Supply Co., LLC
Defendant:
Champion Restoration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Champion Window Manufacturing and Supply Co., LLC v. Champion Contracting & Restoration, LLC
as 1:2012cv00801
Plaintiff:
Champion Window Manufacturing and Supply Co., LLC
Defendant:
Champion Contracting & Restoration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Bellevue Medicine Shoppe v. Overholt's Champion Pharmacy et al
as 4:2012cv00926
Plaintiff:
Bellevue Medicine Shoppe, Inc.
Defendant:
Overholt's Champion Pharmacy, Inc. , Kenneth Overholt and Mary Beth Overholt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Champion v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20090
Plaintiff:
Megan Champion
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
butler v. the champion company
as 3:2010cv00453
Plaintiff:
robert c butler, jr
Defendant:
the champion company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Subpoena to GoDaddy.com, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00095
Interested_party:
Champions School of Real Estate, Ltd.
Burnett et al v. Hill et al
as 2:2010cv00903
Plaintiff:
Doug Burnett , David Henderson and Madison Henderson
Defendant:
Paul H. Hill and Champion Hill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnett et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2010cv00670
Plaintiff:
Doug Burnett , David Henderson and Madison Henderson
Defendant:
Paul H. Hill and Champion Hill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
