Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Chandler v. Carroll et al
as 2:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Karen Carroll , Richard Carroll and David A Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Branchaud et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Matthew Branchaud, Abatiell Associates, P.C., Eric Louttit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Suntag et al
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
David Suntag , Glen L. Yates , Andrew C. Boxer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Village of Newfane, Vermont et al
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Village of Newfane, Vermont, John Feifel, Gary Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chandler v. LaPorte et al
as 2:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Christopher Loyzelle, Kraig LaPorte and Vermont State Police
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. Carroll et al
as 1:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Karen Carroll, William Sorrell and Tracy Shriver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. Albright et al
as 1:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Eric Albright, Christopher Lora, John Waitekus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Keith Clark, Windham County Sheriff's Department, Christopher Lora and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of South Dade, Inc.
as 9:2008cv80115
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler and Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Brandsmart U.S.A. of South Dade, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Chandler v. Sorrell et al
as 1:2007cv00251
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
William Sorrell, Michael Fontaine, Wayne Winot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
