Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Williams v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv01144
Defendant:
Charlotte Collins, Corrections Corporation of America and Nevada Southern Detention Ctr.
Plaintiff:
Frederick V. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohammad Gohir v. Christopher Hoye, et al
as 14-16307
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOHAMMAD SAFDAR GOHIR
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER HOYE, United States Marshal for the District of Nevada and CHARLOTTE COLLINS, Warden, Nevada Southern Detention Center
Gohir v. Hoye et al
as 2:2014cv00760
Defendant:
Charlotte Collins and Christopher Hoye
Petitioner:
Mohammad Safdar Gohir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00722
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lyons v. Cox et al
as 2:2014cv00046
Defendant:
Charlotte Collins, Catherine Cortez Masto, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strohmetz
as 2:2013cv02088
Respondent:
Charlotte Collins
Petitioner:
Richard L. Strohmetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Collins
as 2:2013cv01895
Respondent:
Charlotte Collins
Petitioner:
Leland Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Masters v. Collins
as 2:2013cv01692
Respondent:
Charlotte Collins
Petitioner:
Ryan Daniel Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Collins
as 2:2013cv01624
Respondent:
Charlotte Collins
Petitioner:
Leland Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strohmetz v. Collins
as 2:2013cv01614
Respondent:
Charlotte Collins
Petitioner:
Richard Lawrence Strohmetz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
