Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Simcoe v. Miller
as 6:2021cv06365
Petitioner:
Thomas Simcoe
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00476
Defendant:
Amy Lamanna, Donald Venettozzi, John or Jane Does 6-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Shondell Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Miller
as 1:2021cv02680
Petitioner:
Elliott Carter
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMillian v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv01700
Defendant:
The Guard Officer Green, Superintendent Christopher Miller, Correction Officers 1-15 and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 203 et al v. New Britain Roofing Company, et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
David Yonkonsky, John Embow, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 203 and others
Defendant:
New Britain Roofing Company and Thomas Leith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hall v. Miller
as 1:2021cv00542
Petitioner:
Ralph Hall and Royal Hall
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vializ v. Miller
as 1:2021cv00131
Petitioner:
Benjamin Vializ
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melendez v. Miller
as 1:2020cv06371
Petitioner:
Raurk Melendez
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv01565
Defendant:
Christopher Miller, John Doe, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Detroy Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Miller
as 1:2020cv10351
Petitioner:
Osmondo Smith
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
