Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv20529
Plaintiff:
Capella Photonics, Inc.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
GARY v. CISCO
as 5:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GARY
Defendant:
CISCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cisco v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01181
Plaintiff:
Lester Cisco
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
GARY v. AIRMAR et al
as 4:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GARY
Defendant:
AIRMAR, CISCO SYSTEMS, POLK MEDICAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Airmar et al
as 8:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
Carlton Gary
Defendant:
Airmar, Cisco, Polk Medical Institutition and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 6:2011cv01843
Plaintiff:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HANCOCK BANK v. REEDER et al
as 3:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
HANCOCK BANK
Defendant:
LARRY E REEDER , REGATTA BAY COMMONS ASSOCIATION INC, REGATTA BAY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC and others
Counter_claimant:
LARRY E REEDER
Counter_defendant:
HANCOCK BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cisco v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2010cv81385
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cisco
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare A.G. and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Serrano v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2010cv01261
Petitioner:
Sixto Cisco Serrano
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv02023
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
