Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Delbert Greene v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 10-15819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELBERT M. GREENE
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, ISIDRO BACA, CLAUD WILLIS and others
Timothy Webb v. Glen Whorton, et al
as 10-15701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY E. WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
GLEN WHORTON, Director, NDOC, DOROTHY NASH-HOLMES, Program Administrator, JANE FORAKER-THOMPSON, Supervising Chaplain and others
Crozier v. Endel et al
as 3:2009cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Crozier
Defendant:
Adam Endel, Catherine Cortez Mastos, Claude Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Putzer v. Les Herndon, et al
as 09-17113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PUTZER
Defendant - Appellee:
LES HERNDON, FRITZ SCHLOTTMAN, GEN WHORTON and others
Crozier v. Endel et al
as 3:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allen Crozier
Defendant:
Adam Endel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Claude Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Martin et al
as 3:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Tadaryl Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Martin, Robert Bannister, Gloria Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Ortiz v. David Kelly, et al
as 09-15918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID KELLY, LOYDE COBB, ADAM ENDEL and others
Raymond Padilla v. State of Nevada Department of, et al
as 09-15818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JIM GIBBONS, HOWARD SKOLNICK and others
Nerron Wormley v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 09-15811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NERRON DAVON WORMLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, CLAUDE WILLIS and JEFFREY P. WALKER
Malcolm Gray v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 09-15763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM L. GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, Director of NDOC, JAMES COX, Deputy Director, DOROTHY NASH HOLMES, Programs Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
