Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Walker v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv01149
Plaintiff:
David I. Walker
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Cynthia Spears and Emig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Satterfield v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Satterfield
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Department of Corrections and Dr. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00751
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Wilcox
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, Nurse Tammy and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Correct Care Solutions
as 1:2013cv00713
Plaintiff:
Marcus Henderson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Correct Care Solutions LLC
as 1:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Dale Rodgers
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Mitchell v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Hareem D. Mitchell
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Louise Derosiers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perdow v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Perdow
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Richard Catts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv01312
Plaintiff:
Curtis G. Elliott
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, James Welch, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01311
Plaintiff:
Darrell Trotter
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, D. Squires and Sam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkell v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv01304
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Mental Health Management, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
