Cases 21 - 30 of 93
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 6949 Laurel Canyon, L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv05473
Defendant:
6949 Laurel Canyon, L.P. and Does
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilities Club
United African-Asian Abilitites Club et al v. 4607 Willis Manor, LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv05477
Defendant:
4607 Willis Manor, LLC, Does and Greystone Properties, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilitites Club
United African-Asian Abilitites Club et al v. Carlyle Apartments, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05475
Defendant:
Carlyle Apartments, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilitites Club
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Chateau Regent Partners DE, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05476
Defendant:
Chateau Regent Partners DE, LLC, Does and Global Integrity Realty Corporation
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilitites Club
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. 6819 Laurel Canyon, LLC
as 2:2017cv05471
Defendant:
6819 Laurel Canyon, LLC and DOES
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilitites Club
United African-Asian Abilitites Club et al v. Gregory H. Silberg, et al
as 2:2017cv05469
Defendant:
Does and Gregory H Silberg
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilitites Club
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. Innodex Moorpark, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05472
Defendant:
DOES, Innodex Moorpark, LLC and Ratner Property Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilitites Club
United African-Asian Abilitites Club et al v. Paul S Ling et al
as 2:2017cv05470
Defendant:
Does, Edythe I Ling, Paul S Ling and others
Plaintiff:
David Singletary and United African-Asian Abilitites Club
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
