Cases 21 - 30 of 223
MCKENZIE v. BELLAMY
as 5:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
DONNELL MCKENZIE
Defendant:
BELLAMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapelle-Harrison v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2022cv02268
Petitioner:
Devonte Donnell Chapelle-Harrison
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant:
Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNHAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21951
Plaintiff:
LANDY DONNELL DUNHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. Stovall et al
as 9:2022cv81629
Plaintiff:
Christa Donnell Graham
Defendant:
Gordon C. Stovall, James Butler and Julio-Cesar Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Donnell Campbell
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HARMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19133
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DONNELL HARMAN, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13724
Plaintiff:
BILLY DONNELL KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14046
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DONNELL HALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCARRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10999
Plaintiff:
Charles Donnell McCarrell and CHARLES DONNELL MCCARRELL, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
