Cases 21 - 30 of 336
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Cortez
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talamantez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01402
Petitioner:
Ruben Talamantez, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Sheriff, Wayne Dicky
as 5:2023cv01530
Petitioner:
Earnest Key Johnson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01482
Petitioner:
Adrian A. Garcia and Antonio A. Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odom v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01195
Petitioner:
Kyle Mitchell Odom
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobb v. Collier et al;
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cobb
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Warden J Smith, Sr and Sgt. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cano v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01330
Petitioner:
Ruben Alvino Cano
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
