Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Davidson v. Emmins et al
as 3:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gerald Davidson
Defendant:
S Emmins, T. Jefferson, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson et al v. Emmis et al
as 4:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gerald Alton Davidson
Defendant:
S. Emmis, T. Jefferson, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Emmins et al
as 4:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Gerald Davidson
Defendant:
S Emmins, T. Jefferson, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. US District Court (Rome) Northern District et al
as 4:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
US District Court (Rome) Northern District, United States of America, Dennis Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Owens/DOC et al
as 1:2014cv02191
Petitioner:
James E. Thompson
Respondent:
Brian Owens/DOC and Samuel Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOC Development, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Healthcare, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01673
Plaintiff:
DOC Development, Inc.
Defendant:
DeVilbiss Healthcare, LLC , Jordan Reses Supply Company, LLC , John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. MONEY NOW FUNDING LLC et al
as 4:2013mc00001
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MONEY NOW FUNDING LLC, ROSE MARKETING LLC, DEPAOLA MARKETING LLC and others
Receiver:
PETER S DAVIS
Nelson v. Doc's Food & Spirits, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02496
Plaintiff:
Russell Nelson
Defendant:
Doc's Food & Spirits, Inc.
Advanced Technology Services, Inc. v. KM Docs, LLC
as 1:2011cv03121
Plaintiff:
Advanced Technology Services, Inc.
Defendant:
KM Docs, LLC , Miles Waldron and Harvey Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Brown v. State of Georgia DOC et al
as 1:2010cv03207
Petitioner:
Monica Brown
Respondent:
State of Georgia DOC, Brian Owens and Bruce Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
