Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Smith v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014cv00731
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Mail Room and f/n/u Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davidson County Criminal Court Clerk et al
as 3:2014cv00548
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Davidson County Criminal Court Clerk and Howard Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Metropolitan Public Defender et al
as 3:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Metropolitan Public Defender, Dawn Deaner, Joseph Michael Engle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014mc00253
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and Shaw Vending Company
Smith v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014mc00222
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Mail Room and f/n/u Dean
Smith v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014mc00183
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, (f/n/u) Deathrow, Cassandra Cromer and others
Smith v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2014mc00184
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, F/n/u Bible and F/n/u Dedrickson
Smith v. Correct Care Solutions of Nashville
as 3:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions of Nashville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. TN Board of Parole et al
as 3:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Board of Parole and Kenya Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Medical Department et al
as 3:2013cv01399
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Medical Department, (f/n/u) Bridges, Jake Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
