Cases 21 - 30 of 168
TRUSTEES AND FICUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS et al v. DUKE STEEL, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00211
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS , IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) PENSION PLAN and IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant:
DUKE STEEL, LLC, CORRINE M. DIAMOND and DUKE DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00036
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02187
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02176
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CONCHA v. DUKE et al
as 2:2017cv05321
Plaintiff:
JORGE MEDINA CONCHA
Defendant:
ELAINE C. DUKE, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, RON ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02091
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOUCHER v. DUKE et al
as 2:2017cv05052
Plaintiff:
JEAN BOUCHER
Defendant:
ELAINE C. DUKE, JAMES MCCAMENT and MICHAEL BORGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
