Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Francis Grandinetti, II v. J. Alexander, et al
as 18-15044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Defendant - Appellee:
J. ALEXANDER, C. M. RILEY, J. FLORES and others
Grandinetti v. Alexander et al
as 1:2016cv00480
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
J. Alexander, Riley, J. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria E Aguilar v. Wal Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2016cv04151
Plaintiff:
Maria E Aguilar
Defendant:
Does and Wal Mart Stores Inc
LAU v. LEUNG XUAN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2014cv23511
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LAU , Vidal E. Aguilar, Manuel Irias and others
Defendant:
LEUNG XUAN CORPORATION , LEUNG PHANITDASCK , SONE PHANITDASCK and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05290
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01276
Defendant:
Mr. Acevado, Joseph L. Adams, S. Afhook and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01275
Defendant:
Acevado, Joseph L. Adams, Robert Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01280
Defendant:
A Self Storage, A and M Super Storage, Sami S Abbasi and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01278
Defendant:
Acevado, Robert Adams, Y. Adiboye and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01277
Defendant:
Acevedo, Robert Adams, Y. Adiboye and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
