Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Bulger v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ralph Bulger
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation, Pension Plan for Eaton Employees and Eaton Pension Administration Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Corey v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services et al
as 1:2015cv01736
Plaintiff:
Bruce Corey
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services and Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Zimmers et al v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02398
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Zimmers and Daniel W. Davis
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation and Cooper Notification, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Coykendall v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10000
Plaintiff:
Coykendall, Gail Hart, Mary Fox and others
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc, Honeywell International, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Pneumo Abex LLC and Alva M. Coykendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Endeavor Meshtech, Inc. v. Eaton Corporation
as 1:2014cv02422
Plaintiff:
Endeavor Meshtech, Inc.
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
United States of America v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 1:2013mc00111
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Eaton Corporation and Includible Subsidiaries
United States of America v. Eaton Corporation
as 1:2013mc00102
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Eaton Corporation
Filing Error
as 1:2013cv02685
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McVay v. Armstrong International Inc., et al.
as 1:2013cv10001
Plaintiff:
Karen McVay
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Armstrong Pump, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
