Cases 21 - 30 of 40
THOMPSON v. RUMMEL et al
as 4:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant:
W D RUMMEL, JOHN LONG, DIANN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v SMITH, et al
as 4:2014cv00542
Petitioner:
KENNETH SULLIVAN
Defendant:
DIANN SMITH, MOSES IZUEGBU, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. RUMMEL et al
as 4:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHN LONG, DAWN SMITH, EBONY O HARVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meranda v. Colon et al
as 1:2014cv21701
Plaintiff:
Dana Meranda
Defendant:
Jose Colon, Teresita Dieguez, H. Greenidge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Digiovanni v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel Digiovanni
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Robert Hemphill, Ebony O. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiBartolo v. Cruze et al
as 6:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Steven Joseph DiBartolo
Defendant:
Michael Cruze, Ebony O. Harvey, Milten Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiBartolo v. Cruze et al
as 5:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Steven Joseph DiBartolo
Defendant:
Michael Cruze, Ebony O. Harvey, Milten Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Digiovanni v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Digiovanni
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Robert Hemphill, M.D., Authur Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Digiovanni v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Daniel Digiovanni
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Dr. Hemphill, Authur Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2013cv01317
Plaintiff:
Clarence Walker
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Ebony O. Harvey, J. Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
