Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Westbrook v. Ek et al
as 2:2022cv02224
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Westbrook
Defendant:
Dr. Ek and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Chacon et al
as 2:2022cv02201
Plaintiff:
Russell A Reeves
Defendant:
Jennifer Chacon and Dr. Ek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Adkins et al
as 2:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
. Adkins, . Ek and Danville Health Care Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03002
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Aa sweety 666 Store, AEING Official Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Coe v. Jeffreys et al
as 2:2022cv02115
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Coe
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Justin Young, Jonathan Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ek et al
as 4:2022cv04048
Plaintiff:
Antwon D Smith
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Kasey Kramer, Nellie Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Ek et al
as 4:2022cv04027
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynch
Defendant:
Johnathan Ek, Nellie Boone, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Lamb et al
as 4:2022cv04010
Plaintiff:
Jamal Taylor
Defendant:
Amanda Lamb, . Ek, Kasey Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javaid v. Palackic et al
as 1:2021cv06335
Plaintiff:
Irfan Javaid
Defendant:
S Palackic, EK Hunger, E Peci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. Steele et al
as 4:2021cv04200
Plaintiff:
Edgar M Diaz
Defendant:
Stephanie Steele and . Ek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
