Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al v. Young et al
as 8:2014cv03779
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal Housing Finance Agency
Defendant:
Robert E. Young , Peter Franchot, Gail D. Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
Gwendolyn Laverne Jackson et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, et al.
as 8:2014cv02523
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Laverne Jackson and Ainsworth Charles Jackson
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation , JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. , Matthew A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 8:2014cv02193
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Laverne Jackson and Ainsworth Charles Jackson
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Matthew A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Montgomery County v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 8:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Montgomery County, Maryland
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal Housing Finance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Youngbar v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00898
Plaintiff:
James F. Youngbar
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Corbin v. Burson et al
as 8:2008cv01543
Plaintiff:
Ward L. Corbin
Defendant:
John S. Burson, Aurora Loan Services, Inc. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
