Cases 21 - 30 of 69
In Re: Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez
as 19-1808
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Todd Tryon, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Buffalo, New York Office, and Director of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Elaine Duke, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Juan Higareda-Frutos v. William Barr, et al
as 19-15816
Not Yet Classified:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, JUAN HIGAREDA-FRUTOS and others
Chamol Merino v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv20646
Defendant:
Secretary Kirstjen Michele Nielsen, Acting Director Robert Vitiello, Field Office Dir. Marc J. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Chamol Merino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15942
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00154
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17562
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17378
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17237
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
