Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Michalk v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Wendi Lee Michalk
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C.L. Butch Otter, Ada County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boise State University vs Fred Meyer Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Boise State University and Boise State University
Defendant:
Fred Meyer Inc and Fred Meyer Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Boise State University v. Fred Meyer, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Boise State University
Defendant:
Fred Meyer, Inc. and Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Heiss et al v. Julian et al
as 4:2009cv00400
Plaintiff:
Fred Heiss, Fred Heiss, Anna Belle Heiss and others
Defendant:
Justin W Julian, Hilary Rodham Clinton, Violetta Conti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunt v. Team Performance, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
David P. Hunt
Defendant:
Team Performance, Inc., Jack Tom Kyle, Fred Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gendel v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00425
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Gendel
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gendel v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv00425
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Gendel
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
