Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
GANT v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2009cv87223
Plaintiff: MAZOLA GANT
Defendant: RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
GANT v. RAPID AMERICAN CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv90228
Plaintiff: MAZOLA GANT
Defendant: RAPID AMERICAN CORP., PFIZER, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
GANT et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv86420
Plaintiff: MAZOLA GANT and MAZOLA GANT
Defendant: A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
GANT v. ATLAS TURNER INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60800
Plaintiff: LARRY GANT
Defendant: ATLAS TURNER INC., ATLAS TURNER INC., ATLAS TURNER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
GANT v. CRANE COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv84306
Plaintiff: VIRGINIA GANT
Defendant: CRANE COMPANY, FMC CORP., ITT INDUSTRIAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
GANT v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67413
Plaintiff: WESLEY GANT
Defendant: OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Gant v. Wakefield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01970
Plaintiff: Daniel L. Gant
Defendant: Superintendant Wakefield, Captain Fisher, C/O Longnecker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GANT et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66799
Plaintiff: ALBERT E. GANT and FREDDIE GANT
Defendant: AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?