Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Santiago v. Tapia et al
as 1:2009cv01060
Plaintiff:
Pablo Giovanni Santiago
Defendant:
George Tapia and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dietrich v. Tapia et al
as 1:2009cv01034
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dietrich
Defendant:
George Tapia and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Tapia, et al
as 09-2252
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE TAPIA, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Thomas v. Tapia
as 1:2009cv01009
Plaintiff:
John Paul Thomas
Defendant:
George Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Tapia, et al
as 09-2232
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH TORRES
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE TAPIA and GARY K. KING, Attorney General of the State of new Mexico
Gallegos v. Tapia
as 1:2009cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Gallegos
Defendant:
George Tapia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Killingsworth v. Tapia et al
as 1:2009cv00845
Plaintiff:
Bill Killingsworth
Defendant:
George Tapia and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Tapia, et al
as 09-2198
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL ARTHUR LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE TAPIA, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Trujillo, Sr. v. Tapia, et al
as 09-2185
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE TRUJILLO, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE TAPIA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Herd v. Tapia, et al
as 09-2166
Petitioner - Appellant:
TROY HERD
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE TAPIA, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
