Cases 21 - 30 of 431
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Robins v. Fairman et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Damien Robins
Respondent:
Gary Fairman, Steve L. Dobrescy, Michael Bondgard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, T. Cooke, B. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearring v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Frank Hearring
Defendant:
William Gittere, Tasheena Cooke, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Allred et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Welsh
Defendant:
Allred, Cox, Tasheen S. Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
