Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Bailey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03069
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glen Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodard v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02201
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glen Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone et al v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 2:2021cv00884
Defendant:
OPB Member Glen Holmes, TCI Employee CO Cimmento, OPB Member Alicia Handwerk and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarr R. Stone, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassels et al v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
Olga Cassels and Gregory P. Cassels
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc., Glen Koons, Rodney Karl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. Trilogy Healthcare of Clermont, LLC
as 1:2020cv00736
Defendant:
Trilogy Healthcare of Clermont, LLC a/k/a and d/b/a The Glen, Trilogy Healthcare of Clermont, LLC also known as The Glen doing business as The Glen and The Glen
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGrothers v. GT Pizza, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04050
Defendant:
John Doe 1-10, GT Pizza, Inc., Doe Corporation 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
William McGrothers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Baker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04538
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glen Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ormsbee et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04697
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
REBECCA SUE ORMSBEE and GLEN L. ORMSBEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trader et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04224
Plaintiff:
Glen Trader and Tina Trader
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02805
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glen Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
