Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd. et al v. GoPro, Inc.
as 3:2018cv05923
Plaintiff:
Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd., Blackmagic Design Inc. and Blackmagic Design Technology Inc.
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
ViXS Systems Inc. v. GOPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation
as 3:2018cv03569
Defendant:
GOPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff:
ViXS Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al
as 5:2018md02834
Defendant:
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al, Airbnb, Inc., Stitchfix, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC, PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
American GNC Corporation v. GoPro, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00968
Plaintiff:
American GNC Corporation
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc. , Robert Bosch GmbH and Bosch Sensortec GmbH
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Monument Peak Ventures, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
Monument Peak Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Romero v. Woodman et al
as 3:2018cv01284
Plaintiff:
Mario Romero
Defendant:
Nicholas Woodman, Brian Mcgee, Anthony Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guo v. Woodman et al
as 4:2018cv00920
Defendant:
Kenneth Goldman, Brian McGee, Peter Gotcher and others
Plaintiff:
Wenduo Guo
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mario Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ladd v. Woodman et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Nicholas Woodman , Brian McGee and GoPro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Ladd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Dye v. GoPro, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dye
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc. , Nicholas D. Woodman and Brian T. McGee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Arora v. GoPro, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00265
Plaintiff:
Vikas Aora
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc. , Brian T. McGee and Nicholas D. Woodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
