Cases 21 - 30 of 330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Braboy v. Tilden et al
as 1:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Damien Braboy
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden and Cheryl Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen v. Southern Illinois Hospital Services
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kristi Hansen
Defendant:
Southern Illinois Hospital Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Rahmani v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv16578
Plaintiff:
Haqiqurahman Rahmani
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Mark Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv16577
Plaintiff:
Haqiqurahman Rahmani
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv16576
Plaintiff:
UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN, MERRICK B GARLAND and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Talley v. Krawitz et al
as 3:2023cv50417
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Brian Krawitz, Deepak P. Edward, Michael Offutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
