Cases 21 - 30 of 39
O'CULL v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00570
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. O'CULL
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, MARY ELLEN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SHIPLEY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00485
Plaintiff:
LLOYD D. SHIPLEY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GEORGACARAKOS v. WATTS et al
as 1:2008cv02147
Plaintiff:
PETER GEORGACARAKOS
Defendant:
HARRELL WATTS, BAXTER and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GROSS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01246
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELMER GROSS, SR.
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and HARRELL WATTS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HEMMINGS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00907
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. HEMMINGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADAM MICHAEL ABENSOHN, SEAN THOMAS HARAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AKERS v. WATTS et al
as 1:2008cv00140
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY AKERS
Defendant:
HARRELL WATTS, MICHAEL NALLEY, R. WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUM v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv00109
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRUM
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARRELL WATTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLT v. QUINTANA et al
as 1:2007cv02174
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. HOLT
Defendant:
FRANCISCO QUINTANA, J. GRIFFIN, SHARON BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. WATTS
as 1:2007cv02150
Plaintiff:
KEN KENYATTA WILSON
Defendant:
HARRELL WATTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEFF v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01672
Plaintiff:
MARK L. NEFF
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, RICHARD CARROLL, DANIEL L. KNAPPMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
