Cases 21 - 30 of 14,462
Keener v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv50199
Plaintiff:
Marcie J Keener
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arnold v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04334
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Arnold
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
J.B.H. v. Knox County et al
as 4:2024cv04096
Plaintiff:
J. B. H.
Defendant:
Knox County, Raymond A. Cavanaugh, Bridget E. Pletz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rojas v. Barnes et al
as 1:2024cv04381
Defendant:
J. Mandella Barnes, Mandela Barnes, Mandela Barnes for Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Young v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04300
Plaintiff:
Susan J. Young
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gibbons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01390
Plaintiff:
Molly J Gibbons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Morse v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01379
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Morse
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04285
Plaintiff:
Ledwayne Bell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
