Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Davis v. Woodford
as 5:2010cv05235
Petitioner:
Lachoy Davis
Respondent:
Jeanne S. Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maurice Campbell v. CDCR, et al
as 10-17353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE C. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, RODERICK Q. HICKMAN and others
Aaron Cooper v. Jeanne Woodford
as 10-16522
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON L. COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR
Anthony Dawkins v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-55722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. DAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, T. OCHOA, C. BUTLER and others
Sam Bess, et al v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-15990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM BESS
Plaintiff:
RYAN COUCH, KENNETH JIMENEZ and BARNABE TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID SHAW, RODERICK HICKMAN and others
Julian de Medeiros v. James Yates, et al
as 10-15919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN GAGO DE MEDEIROS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, GAIL LEWIS and others
Fernando Guizar v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-15570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO GUIZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, E. ALAMEIDA, Jr., G. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
S C WOHLEND, V C BASSO, S. JAMES and others
Frye v. Calderon, et al
as 2:1999cv00628
Petitioner:
Jerry Grant Frye
Respondent:
Jeanne S. Woodford , California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Robert L. Ayers
Defendant:
Robert L. Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Weaver v. Woodford
as 1:2002cv05583
Petitioner:
Ward Francis Weaver, Jr
Respondent:
Jeanne S. Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Riel v. Woodford
as 2:2001cv00507
Petitioner:
Charles D Riel
Respondent:
Jeanne S. Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
