Cases 21 - 30 of 45
ROSSMANN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02850
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, NANCY BERRYHILL, ASHEESH AGARWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
ROSSMANN v. MCVEIGH et al
as 1:2017cv02370
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
BRIAN MCVEIGH, L. ERIC PATTERSON, JOSEPH MAHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHERRY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
GERRI CHERRY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ALONZO WILSON, OFFICER VEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. NETANYAHU et al
as 1:2017cv02157
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, "JEWS" MORE GENERALLY, JOHN DOE-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAW FIRM OF LARJACK, PLLC v. CITIBANK, NA et al
as 1:2017cv02075
Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICE OF LARJACK, PLLC
Defendant:
CITIBANK, NA, DANIEL SIGNORI, BIN KAMAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE 1 et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv02005
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 , JANE DOE 2 , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
ROSSMANN v. PATTERSON et al
as 1:2017cv01688
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
ERIC PATTERSON, CHANNING PHILLIPS, JOHN DOE-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROSSMANN v. LUSTIG et al
as 1:2017cv01124
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
CRYSTAL LUSTIG, U.S. PROBATION OFFICE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, APPELLATE COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. HARVEY et al
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
G. MICHAEL HARVEY, U.S. CIRCUIT COURT, JOHN DOE-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. WICHLINSKI et al
as 1:2017cv00716
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. WICHLINSKI, JOHN DOE-1, JOHN DOE-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
