Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Leonard v. Seabulk Towing Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02310
Plaintiff:
Keegan Leonard
Defendant:
Seabulk Towing Services, Inc. and Graham Offshore Tugs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Kostuch et al
as 2:2010cv01416
Plaintiff:
George Kostuch, Jr
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. and James C. Kelsoe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Fishman et al v. Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Elise Y. Fishman and Ralph H. Fishman
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Cowan v. Morgan Keegan & Co Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01644
Plaintiff:
Brian A Cowan
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co Inc and Tandy G. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Keegan v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05105
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Keegan, Michael F. Keegan and Michael F. Keegan
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Acosta et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05258
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Acosta, April Loren Adams, Arnold C. Angel and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Davies et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03275
Plaintiff:
Sandmann Davies, Sandmann Davies, Sandmann Davies and others
Defendant:
Morgan Asset Management, Inc., RMK Advantage Income Fund, Inc., RMK High Income Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown et al v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2008cv04328
Plaintiff:
Ronell Brown, Kathyline A. Deel, Michael F. Keegan and others
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
